CUFOA

Canadian Unlicensed Firearms Owners Association
Association canadienne des propriétaires d’armes sans permis

Letters to the Prime Minister
& other Federal Ministers

homebutton contacts button articlesbutton photos linksbutton
 

An Open Letter to the Canadian Firearms Advisory Committee


I therefore submit in conclusion that Bill C-68, if passed into law, will not be a good law. It will be a bad law, a blight on the legislative record of the government, a law that fails the three great tests of constitutionality, of effectiveness and of the democratic consent of the governed.

What should be the fate of a bad law? It should be repealed, which is precisely what a Reform government will do when it eventually replaces this government.
- Preston Manning, House of Common Debate, 13 June 1995.


Property and Civil Rights in the Province.
British North America Act, 1867, section 92 (13)


Ladies and Gentlemen of the CFAC,

As you meet in Ottawa this week you have a BIG job to do.

You are now Canadians’ representatives to a Government with a grossly perverted sense of Justice.

We did not elect this Government to abuse our Rights and steal our Property.

We ask you to remind our elected representatives that we sent them to Ottawa to stop the abuses of Jean Chrétien’s Liberal Government of Allan Rock and Anne McClellan.

We sent them to Ottawa to protect our Property and our Right to own and use firearms.

We ask you to put a stop to the historic negationism1 - the guileful historical revisionism - that Mr. Harper is actively perpetrating upon us.

We would remind you of the Promises that Mr. Harper and the Conservatives made to responsible Canadian firearms owners over the past seventeen years.

Mr. Harper:

I was and still am in total agreement with the statement made in the House of Commons by former Reform Leader Preston Manning on 13 June 1995:

Bill C-68, if passed into law will not be a good law. It will be a blight on the legislative record of the government, a law that fails the three great tests of constitutionality, of effectiveness and of democratic consent to f the governed. What should be the fate of a bad a law? It should be repealed ... .

Bill C-68 [The Firearms Act] has proven to be a bad law and has created a bureaucratic nightmare for both gun owners and the government. As Leader of the Official Opposition, I will use all powers afforded to me as Leader and continue our party’s fight to repeal Bill C-68 and replace it with a firearms control system that is cost effective and respects the rights of Canadians to own and use firearms responsibly.2

- Stephen Harper, January 2002

Garry Breitkreuz’s promise as Conservative Firearms Critic, 08 July 2005:

There is only one way to fix this mess and that is to elect a Conservative government. We promise to repeal Bill C-68 … . 2

We would remind you of the official Conservative Party of Canada Policy Declaration as drafted by firearms owners and approved by the CPC Montréal Convention, 19 March 2005:

A Conservative Government will repeal Canada’s costly gun registry legislation and work with the provinces and territories on cost-effective gun control programs designed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals while respecting the rights of law-abiding Canadians to own and use firearms responsibly … . 2

Please Note Well:

“respecting the rights of law-abiding Canadians to own and use firearms responsibly.”

The licencing mandate of the Firearms Act destroys our historic Right to own firearms.
A licence denies that the Right to own firearms ever existed in our culture.
The Criminal Code penalties against the mere possession of a firearm assure that the Right will never be seen again.

Yet our elected Conservative Members of Parliament now proudly proclaim:

The Conservative Party has never claimed to want to repeal the Firearms Act.3
The Government of Canada supports the current licensing scheme … .4
We will not be changing the requirement for individuals to hold a license.5

Even the Government Leader in the House of Commons Peter Van Loan now says:

The licensing system was not part of the gun registry introduced by the Liberal government in 1995. It is a long-standing system that has been in place for many decades.6

The Conservatives introduce shamefully deficient Bills and promote them as the answer to our prayers.
They lie to us to our face and print falsehoods in their written communication.
They pass an obscenely inadequate piece of legislation as ask us to celebrate.
They serve hors d'oeuvre in honour of a betrayal.

This is not willful ignorance; this is mendacious historical revisionism.

Preston Manning, Stephen Harper, Garry Breitkreuz; these men did not promise simply the “end of the long-gun registry”; they promised to repeal Bill C-68 – gun registration, licencing, orders-in-council, seizure without arrest – the entire ball of wax.

As Greg Illerburn, former President of the Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation and current Chair of the Responsible Firearms Owners of Saskatchewan said last week:

Most people believe Bill C-19 will eliminate the need to have a licence.

But after Bill C-19 becomes law, the worst parts of the Firearms Act and Criminal Code prohibitions against firearms and firearms owners still remain intact in law.

Garry Breitkreuz reminds us:

Bill C-68 … gives the Government such sweeping power that they could ban … all firearms in Canada and not even the Supreme Court of Canada could overturn it. … Why would the Liberals give themselves such awesome power if they didn’t intend to use it?7
Why do the Conservatives keep such power if they do not intend to use it?

Therefore we respectfully ask you to tell the people who called you to Ottawa that we are neither fools nor subjects; we are informed CITIZENS.

Please tell Mr. Harper and the Conservatives that they do not have the “democratic consent of the governed.”

Tell them to honour the British North America Act, 1867, section 92 (13); to return “Property and Civil Rights” exclusively to “the Province.”

Tell Mr. Harper we will NOT accept a bone tossed to us under the table.

Tell Mr. Harper we have RIGHTS and that we will continue to defend them.

We will only accept FREEDOM – our Right to property and armed self-defence.

We will NOT ask the Government for permission to defend ourselves, our families, and our homes.

Canada did not need Bill C-68 in 1995, and Canada does not need any part of Bill C-68 now.

Please tell Mr. Harper that we will gladly accept either a 1977-style FAC, a Firearms Prohibition Registry as we have proposed,8 or a USA-style Instant Background Check as Dr. Mauser has suggested.9

If you would do us this honour we would be most grateful.

Sincerely,

Edward B. Hudson, DVM, MS
Secretary
Friday 23 March 2012

Ref:

1. Negationism Defined
http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres6/distorroumeng.pdf

2. The Conservatives’ Promises to Firearms Owners
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/primeminister/pm_19_jan_2002.html

3. Shelly Glover, MP, CPC, letter dated 15 August 2011
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/primeminister/pm_15_aug_2011.html

4. The Hon. Rob Nicholson. Minister of Justice, CPC, letter dated 07 September 2011
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/primeminister/pm_07_sept_2011.html

5. Candice Hoeppner, M.P., CPC, letter dated 12 December 2011
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/primeminister/pm_12_dec_2011.html

6. Peter Van Loan, P.C., M.P., Leader of the Government in the House of Commons,
letter dated 17 February 2012
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/primeminister/pm_17_feb_2012b.html

7. Garry Breitlreuz, Orders-in-Council, Letter dated 21 September 2000
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/licensing/licensing_21_sept_2000.html

8. Firearms Prohibition Registry
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/primeminister/pm_26_feb_2012.html

9. Mauser: Boiling Frogs – and Gun Owners
http://www.cufoa.ca/articles/licensing/licensing_29_jan_2004.html

Canadian Unlicensed Firearms Owners Association
Association canadienne des propriétaires d’armes sans permis
402 Skeena Court Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 4H2
(306) 242-2379 (306) 230-8929
edwardhudson@shaw.ca
www.cufoa.ca