Canadian Unlicensed Firearms Owners Association
Association canadienne des propriétaires d’armes sans permis

A Cancer of the Soul

homebutton contacts button articlesbutton photos linksbutton

Responsible Firearms Owners of
55-11th St. West Brooks, AB T1R 0C8
Winter 2013

Printer-Friendly Version

There is evidence that gun laws do not have any effect on crime.
Douglas R. Murray (department of Sociology, U. of Wisconsin) published a report based on evidence in 1975 (the Journal of Social Problems) called "Handguns, Gun Control laws, and Firearms Violence).

Mr. Murray concludes: "the data have indicated that gun laws have no effect on either handgun ownership or on crime rates, suggesting that this type of legislation is totally irrelevant to its stated purpose. Therefore a return to a basic theory of firearms control legislation seems in order. As stated, the primary reason for the existence of these laws is to control access to guns so that guns are less likely to be used in acts of violence. Thus far, the relationships between gun laws and crime rates is non-existent."

And Dr. Caillin Langmann did a similar data analysis on Canadian firearms crime rates and attempted to correlate any changes in the Canadian crime rates to the introduction of firearm legislation between 1974 and 2008. Dr. Langmann used three different methodologies to account for variables and correlate data and gun laws. Mr. Langmann came to the conclusion that Canadian gun laws restricting access to firearms had no impact on the firearms crime rate (either positive or negative).

Bottom lin, gun laws do not work to change criminal behavior.
The folks who claim that gun laws stop criminal behavior are simply lying.
The folks who claim that firearms change the morals, values, and give folks criminal intent are also lying.

Some RFOA members may be asking why there has been no newsletter for over 6 months. One explanation is that Section 91 of the Criminal Code has NOT been amended. Possession of a firearm is still a criminal code offence subject to a 4 year prison term. The debate over the gun registry has been a diversion from the criminal liability associated with the gun license.
If you have not noticed already the theme of teh RFOA newsletters is about what happens to a gun owner when their gun license expires - they have to give up their guns or face criminal charges.
Another issue is that when the laws (or regulations) are changed there is uncertainty as to what will actually be enforced - the actions of the C.F.O. Ontario, and the Courts in Quebec are an example of this. It has taken six months and we still do not know if the protected personal and private information on Quebec gun owners will be handed over to the province of Quebec - despite privacy laws.

I have come to the conclusion that the anti-gun owner movement is not public, but has its roots in the Federal Civil Service - people who have built an empire keeping track of law abiding Canadian. These same folks are working against those Politicians who support gun owners so they can keep their bureaucratic empires intact.

The debate is NOT OVER until the criminal sanctions against possession of a firearm is struck from the criminal code.