Firearms Owners Association
From: Dennis R. Young
Dear Minister Toews:
It's been over a year since I wrote you. I sent the original to your Parliament Hill office and a copy to your Ministerial headquarters. I never received an acknowledgement or reply. All my mail has been forwarded to my new address for the last year by Canada Post and my own MP has been unable to get any response from your office so I don't think it was lost in the mail. I think a year is long enough to wait, don't you?
Dennis R. Young 1330
CC: To all Conservative MPs and Senators -------------------------------------------
From: Dennis R. Young
Conservatives treat Law-abiding gun owners worse than criminals
April 4, 2012
The Honourable Vic Toews, Minister of Public Safety
On Thursday, March 29, 2012 in the House of Commons you said: "I can indicate our Conservative government does not support treating law-abiding hunters, farmers and sports shooters as criminals." The sad fact is that law-abiding gun owners will continue to be treated worse than criminals even after the long-gun registry is scrapped. If your statement is true, please explain why does your government still treat millions of honest, trustworthy, upright gun owners as more dangerous than the 324,723 persons prohibited by the courts from owning firearms? For example, licensed gun owners who fail to report their change of address within thirty days could go to jail for up to two years while those prohibited from possessing firearms face no such requirement or criminal penalty. Also, the homes and businesses of licensed gun owners are subject to "inspections" but not those convicted criminals on the list of those prohibited from owning firearms. And pity the more than 338,000 unfortunate gun owners who have let their firearms licenses expire or the millions who forgot to get a license in the first place because they wait nervously for the police (and sometimes even a SWAT team) to arrive to search their homes, seize and destroy their legally acquired property and charge them with unlawful possession of a firearm under Sections 91 or 92 of the Criminal Code of Canada. I say "unfortunate" because even though they had no criminal intent and have not committed an unsafe or violent act, they could go to jail for two, five or even ten years simply for failing to get a piece of paper from your government.
Before you and your colleagues can honestly say that law-abiding gun owners are no longer treated like criminals, you will have to repeal those "paper crimes" from laws the Liberals rammed through Parliament in 1995 with the passage of Bill C-68. The Leader of Reform Party, the Leader of the Canadian Alliance Party and, according to some of your own constituents, even you used to promise to "Repeal Bill C-68". The gun control regime that was in place in 1994 only cost the federal government $15 million a year to operate and was just as effective at keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals as the new and improved Liberal anti-gun owner regime in place today that continues to cost taxpayers at least four times that amount annually.
As you may remember, I worked for Garry Breitkreuz for thirteen years on the firearms file and offer the government my assistance if needed. The evidence clearly shows that law-abiding gun owners are the least likely to be a public safety threat and yet for the last seventeen years the government has placed a very expensive target on our backs all the while ignoring the real threat to police and the public: convicted violent criminals. It makes no sense to spend tens of millions a year to track millions of honest folk like us and not know the whereabouts of a few hundred thousand of the most dangerous persons in Canada.
Why are the rights and freedoms of convicted violent criminals more important than ours?
[Original signed by]
Dennis R. Young
CC: To all Conservative MPs and Senators