Bill C-19 Delayed
Time for Sober Second Thought
Bill C-19, the bill to abolish the long-gun registry … has been
left on the shelf as the House of Commons prepares to break for Christmas.1
- CBC News, 14 December 2011
While this holiday delay in the Conservatives’ plan to pass Bill
C-19 might be stressful to some gun owners, I suggest this is an excellent
time for some ‘sober second thought’ about the implications
of this Bill.
First, one should note what Bill C-19, An Act to amend the Criminal
Code and the Firearms Act, actually does.
As the CBC headline notes, Bill C-19 will “abolish the long-gun
And as Public Safety Minister Vic Toews has loudly proclaimed with much
fanfare and hyperbole, destroying the records in the long-gun registry
“was implicit in this government's longstanding promise to abolish
But more importantly for our children and grandchildren is what Bill
C-19 does NOT do:
- Bill C-19 does nothing to fulfill the Conservative Party Platform
to respect “the Rights of law-abiding Canadians to own and use
- Bill C-19 does nothing to correct the worst part of Jean Chrétien’s
1995 Firearms Act.
- Bill C-19 does nothing to repeal the licensing mandate of the
- Bill C-19 does nothing to change the law that makes the mere possession
of a firearm illegal.
- Bill C-19 does nothing to keep the police from confiscating our personal
property without criminal charge, trial, or conviction.
- Bill C-19 does nothing to prevent the police from entering our homes
to “inspect” a licence to possess our personal property.
As Jerrold Lundgard, President of the Responsible Firearms Owners of
Alberta (RFOA) consistently reminds us:
Bill C-19’s removal of gun registration from section 91 of the
Criminal Code is a political Trojan Horse.
Bill C-19 is a diversion from the fact that (the Liberals’) Bill
C-68 (The Firearms Act, 1995) amended section 91 of Canadian
Criminal Code to read:
Unauthorized possession of firearm
91. (1) ... every person commits an offence who possesses a firearm
without being the holder of
(a) a licence under which the person may possess it … .
Notably, under section 117 of the Firearms Act the federal
Minister can revoke every firearms license in Canada.
Removal of the requirement to have a registration certificate from
section 91 is a diversion.
So long as section 91 stands with the licensing portion un-amended
a future ban on guns is only an Order in Council away.
Simply deleting the long-gun registry will not correct any of these
Please give these points some serious thought.
And while you reflect, I suggest you consider:
Ms. Shelly Glover, Conservative Member of Parliament for Saint Boniface,
comments about future action:
The Conservative Party has never claimed to want to repeal the Firearms
Did you diligently work for sixteen years to elect a majority Conservative
Government to accept meekly nothing more than ‘a good first step’?
I also suggest you read Minister of Justice Rob Nicholson’s recent
proclamation about his endorsement of the Liberals’ licencing mandate:
The Government of Canada supports the current licensing scheme …
Did you invest your time, money, and effort for sixteen years to elect
a majority Conservative Government only now to consent silently to a sell-out?
This is not the time to be
Send your Member of Parliament or your Conservative Senator
a Christmas message:
Tell Mr. Harper and the Conservatives that they must
decriminalize the ownership of firearms.
Edward B. Hudson DVM, MS
16 December 2011
(1) Long-gun bill left to languish in lead-up to holidays
(2) Gun registry isn't effective gun control: Toews
(3) Re: "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts", Firearms
Digest, December 15, 2011
(4) Shelly Glover, letter dated August 15, 2011
(5) The Honourable Rob Nicholson, letter dated September
Canadian Unlicensed Firearms Owners Association
Association canadienne des propriétaires d’armes sans permis
402 Skeena Court Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 4H2
(306) 242-2379 (306) 230-8929